This is an archived article from my now-defunct NeonReviews website. Any qualities and/or information provided about the reviewed item must be seen in context of when it was originally published.

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox
Genre: Action / Thriller
Availability: Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk
Related links: Official website for the Die Hard Collection (no longer available)
Additional information: Second part of the “Die Hard” triology. Die Hard (review), Internet Movie Database (IMDb) entry

Bruce Willis is back in the role of John McClane in the sequel to the original Die Hard movie, still around Christmas time, this time one year later, at Dulles airport in Washington D.C. For what reason, no-one knows. The thrill is still there, as well as some of the excitement, but the filmmakers didn’t quite get the chemistry right for this follow-up. What could’ve been a good movie had become a mediocre movie.

John McClane has a bad feeling about a couple of guys at the airport and decides to follow them into the airport’s luggage room to see what they’re up to. It ends up in a gunfight where he kills one of them, and as it turns out, this guy is already dead. Two years ago. And he has the record of a mercenary. Following this, the air traffic control tower loses all control of the airport and all contact with the airplanes coming in. Terrorists have taken over, and a known terrorist is on his way from a small (and fictional) country in the Latin America, originally extradited to the USA. As usual in a movie involving terrorists, their demand is the cliché of liberating another terrorist.

I didn’t enjoy this movie as much as the original movie, and from what I remember about the third movie in the triology, this must be the unnecessary one of them all. The blame can be mainly put on the plot and the script writers. All the actors did a fantastic job, but that doesn’t help the movie much when the people who put together the story behind it all did a lousy job. This was confirmed when I had a look at IMDb’s goofs page for this movie, and there are a lot of technology that has been entirely ignored. There are many redundancy options for air traffic controllers and airports in general to avoid situations such as this, even at the time this movie was made. The only ones who’ll believe the situation presented to us, are the ones who also will believe that the gibberish spoken in even older movies truly is in those foreign languages. And I do mean gibberish, no matter what language we’re talking about.

I would only recommend this movie to die hard fans of the Die Hard movies and Bruce Willis.

As a side note, you’ll notice a few faces that has turned up in later well-known movies and TV series. It makes me think that these actors’ careers really must’ve gotten a boost by this movie. Among the terrorists, you’ll notice Robert Patrick (“Terminator 2” as T-1000, “The X-Files” as Agent John Doggett), Vondie Curtis-Hall (“Chicago Hope” as Dr. Dennis Hancock, “Broken Arrow” as Lt. Col. Sam Rhodes) and John Leguizamo (“Moulin Rouge!” as Toulouse Lautrec, “Ice Age” as the voice of Sid). Also recognizable are Dennis Franz (“NYPD Blue” as Andy Sipowicz), Art Evans (“Metro” as Lt. Sam Baffett), John Amos (“The District” as Mayor Ethan Backer) and Fred Dalton Thompson (U.S. Senator for Tennessee 1994-2002).

Story interest:  

Plot development:  

Characters:  

Credibility:  

Visual effects:  

Overall:  

This is an archived article from my now-defunct NeonReviews website. Any qualities and/or information provided about the reviewed item must be seen in context of when it was originally published.

Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox
Genre: Action / Thriller
Availability: Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk
Related links: Official website for the Die Hard Collection (no longer available)
Additional information: First part of the “Die Hard” triology. Die Hard 2 – Die Harder (review), Internet Movie Database (IMDb) entry

This classic from 1988 can still compare to the action movies of today, with Bruce Willis as the unforgettable New York cop John McClane and Alan Rickman as the German terrorist Hans Gruber. Although the German “stereotype” shines through a tad too much, Rickman manages to tone down the aric, violent-prone tough guy image Hollywood has made the majority of the German population. For which I’m eternally grateful. We have enough stereotypes as it is.

We start off with John McClane coming to Los Angeles to visit his wife and kids for Christmas. His wife works in the skyskraper office building of Nakatomi Corporation, a Japanese firm that works with God-knows-what (we’re never told). All employees are present because of a Christmas party held in the 30th floor. Enter Hans Gruber and his gang, who kill the guards, locks down the building and takes everyone at the Christmas party hostage. McClane, however, isn’t caught because he was in his wife’s office at the time the first shots were fired, and manages to escape to an empty part of the building. The police is unaware of the situation, and this is where McClane has to fight back on his own.

It’s amazing to see that a movie this “old” is still able to stand up to movies in the same genre of today. Both cinematic quality and special effects are good. It’s quite a start of this triology (which is about to become a quadrupology, just like the Alien “triology”).

The copy I had in my hands for review was a “Special Edition” DVD. Despite the fact that it included deleted scenes, I chose to watch it without them because I hadn’t seen the movie for quite a while. I took a closer look on the second disc afterwards, and was a bit disappointed when there was very little behind-the-scenes footage and a huge amount of deleted/alternate scenes and footage. No documentaries, just the unused footage. It sure is a good thing that ever since DVD was introduced, the studios have been making sure there’s a behind-the-scenes documentary of some kind for most movies made (at least with a certain budget). To put it short, I was disappointed with the lack of a documentary with this release.

All in all, a movie worth keeping in your DVD collection, and a must if you like action movies.

Story interest:  

Plot development:  

Characters:  

Credibility:  

Visual effects:  

Overall:  

This is an archived article from my now-defunct NeonReviews website. Any qualities and/or information provided about the reviewed item must be seen in context of when it was originally published.

Guest reviewer HeavyJay from Deep 13 – The Web Comic. (Contact information and links no longer available.)

Distributor: New Line Cinema
Genre: Horror
Availability: Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk
Related links: Official website
Additional information: Internet Movie Database (IMDb) entry

As a horror fan, I found myself believing that Freddy vs. Jason would be a huge disappointment. The long-awaited film, which had been in planning for ten years, couldn’t possibly live up to the name of its predecessors. Most horror films made past 1995 have proven to be excruciating to watch, filled with annoying characters and thin plots. After the pure torture of Jason X, I was almost frightened to go see this newest installment. This wasn’t necessary, as I soon found out.

The picture opens with a rare glimpse at Robert Englund without make-up, giving a history of Freddy Krueger’s crimes, and eventually his afterlife. He explains that he’s been forgotten by the people of Springwood, thus rendering him out of the picture. In Hell, he found someone to do the killing for him, to bring back the fear that enabled his return: Jason. Cut to opening credits, and then a classic Voorhees murder at Crystal Lake. A minute and a half into the film, and already a pair of breasts on the screen.

From there, Jason kills enough to bring Freddy back to full power… but he’s tasted murder again, and he likes it. When Jason starts stealing his kills, Freddy’s pissed and everyone knows it. Lots of slaughter ensues on both ends.

One of my favourite scenes in the movie takes place in a corn field. The high school kids of Springwood hold a rave in a giant field, out of which Jason eventually emerges. Two stoned teens set him ablaze with a torch, only angering him. He walks through the rows, burning a nice trail, and into the main party circle in which he slices every teenager who didn’t get away quick enough. As one smashed party-goer put it, “That goalie’s pissed about something…”

The final battle, roughly twenty-five minutes long, is worth the price of the movie ticket alone. It’s filled with action, laughs, gore, and girls and almost makes you excuse the ten-year wait.

In the end, Freddy vs Jason measures up. It’s got everything you could want in a horror and a little bit more. Go give it a look-see; any horror fan will like it.

Story interest:  

Plot development:  

Characters:  

Credibility:  

Visual effects:  

Overall: